RomRaider

Mine is A2WC000E and DBW. Altough I crossed my fingers and flashed my ECU with A2WC011E and it works with no problems.

For A2WC000E.

Requested Torque (Accelerator Pedal): 5db70 --> 5db18
Accelerator Pedal Angle: 5daec --> 5da94
Engine Speed: 5db2c --> 5dad4

Target Throttle Plate Position (Requested Torque): 5d6ac --> 5d654
Requested Torque: 5d628 --> 5d5d0
Engine Speed: 5d66c --> 5d614
--

You are a brave sole!

Ticket open: http://trac2.assembla.com/romraider/ticket/70

[FYI] There are 5 types of ECU for JDM Forester STI(SG9).
22611AJ540 SG9C 2003/11-2004/11 A2WC000E
22611AJ541 SG9C 2004/12-2005/01 A2WC010E??
22611AJ542 SG9D 2004/11-2005/12 A2WC011E
22611AJ543 SG9E 2005/11-2006/08 A2WC012E
22611AJ544 SG9E 2006/08-2007/01 A2WC013E??
22611AJ544 SG9F 2006/11-2007/11 A2WC013E??
--

See FAST-II.

I found this thread regarding the drive by wire tables for the SG9 STI Foresters and it was great. My question is why does Chero_b4 tables (in jpg) show the throttle plate at %100 at max torque of 320 but the defs you supplied only have the throttle plate opening a maximum of %84...is there an error somewhere...who is correct??

Multiplier on the Throttle Angle is different. 84% is 100% throttle

There is no multiplier defined in the def for this (you can check the Table Properties). These are all raw float values direct from the ROM (84% is the max), but there is a dynamic multiplier value used (0xFFC3A8) that affects the value pulled from the 'Target Throttle Plate Position' table before it is written as Extended Logger parameter E57 'Target Throttle Plate Position 4byte'. Under certain conditions there's a smaller 2x2 table used for Target Throttle Plate Position.
Can you log 0xFFC3A8 as a float?

Well dshcultz that is quite interesting however I have no idea how to view or log the address you mentioned. I wonder why a dynamic multiplier is used?... (I dont think the 1mb 32bit ECU's use such a setup like my XT 07 Forester)...(FSTI ECU's 512k 32bit)
Using the fixed mulitplier suggestion on the earlier post I was able to get an identical table as the one supplied by chero_b4.
What I have basically been doing is copying tables from the Forester STI ecu's and applying them to my 07 Forester XT.
I have verified the compression ratio between the two engines is only 0.2 difference and the FSTI only boosts around 1 psi more than a stock XT. (note... I have a VF41 turbo and FSTI intercooler )
I have had quite a lot of success however the two issues I have had is obtaining an accurate DBW table and sorting out fuel injector settings as i believe the FSTI actually uses a slightly lower flow injector. This causes a continuous rich setup as verified in Learning view in closed loop and an AFR of around 10.5 using my wideband gauge in open loop.(FSTI uses side feed yellow inj and 07 XT uses dark blue top feed inj)
All in all its great and in the past I used a modified version of a ADM Impreza STI DBW table and it worked very well.
After using these defs for the tables of the FSTI ecu it as been quite disappointing...obviously using the raw table for throttle plate with a maximum of 84% makes a sluggish responding vehicle and using the table supplied by chero_b4 is much better but still not as good as my modified 07 Impreza STI table.
So all I am trying to do is use Subaru tables to work on my XT which it seems to work...note I do not have any major detonation problems from what I can tell using learning view...all are 0.00 except one cell at max boost and one cell near idle low load.

Same, here; I run mine with modified usdm sti dbw tables with better response, was also running very rich OL too till I rescaled the Maf.

Paste this into your current logger.xml def file. Paste it immediately above the </ecuparams> tag 4 rows up from the bottom of the file. Let us know what values you get under different starting and driving conditions.

Well I added the above code into the logger defs but the parameter in RR logger did not appear as the pics show...maybe I did something wrong.

Is your ECU ID 3B02594216 ?