RomRaider

Open Source ECU Tools
 FAQ •  Register •  Login 

RomRaider

Documentation

Community

Developers

It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 5:46 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:47 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 2273
Please start a thread in the tuning discussion subforum for that question.

_________________
2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, LC, FFS, OMG
Please don't send me tuning questions via PM - use the forums instead. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:10 pm 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:01 am
Posts: 100
NSFW wrote:
You're mostly correct, but there is a little bit more to it.

The D trim (or E trim, if your car has 5 of them) is effective even in open loop. If you do all of your fuel tuning without resetting the ECU, that doesn't matter. But if you reset the ECU when you reflash, then there's a good chance that you're logging and tuning with a 0% D trim. The problem is that if the D trim moves to +5% after a couple days' driving (it can take a while) then you're now running about 0.5 richer than what you saw during your tune/flash/log iterations. If the D trim moves to -5%, then you're 0.5 leaner, which is asking for trouble.

For the other trims, it's mostly just about the warm fuzzy feeling that comes from getting the balance right without the ECU having to make up the difference.



I was wondering will this LV D trim reset on its own? I have this -3% after a few days of driving. I did a check yesterday and it was 0!!!

and when D trim shows negative 3% thought this means we are running rich by 3%?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:15 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 2273
They all move around over time. My A trim in particular can move a few percent while I sit idling at a stoplight.

The trim percentage is the amount of fuel that the ECU added or removed (from its initial calculations, based on MAF scaling and injector settings) to achieve the AFR that it wanted (usually around 14.7). I think it's a mistake to say that you are or were rich or lean - it's probably not true and it implies some other things that may or may not be true.

For closed-loop, as long as your trims are between +10% and -10% you're almost certainly getting the AFR that the ECU wants. If you're between -5% and +5%, thats great.

For open-loop, you really need a wideband to know what's going on. You can speculate based on what your AF Learning values are doing, but I don't think they tell you enough to actually make any good guesses.

_________________
2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, LC, FFS, OMG
Please don't send me tuning questions via PM - use the forums instead. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm
Posts: 9
Location: Moscow, Russia
Hi, NSFW, thanks for your great topic!

I have a question, please. After a winter i decided to check my closed-loop MAF scaling and was surprised that airflow ranges were all negatives, about 5-6%, and the same persentage for D+. :( My MAF is stock. Ok, i used Dweeb method and substruct some persents from my MAF scale in closed loop. Then i drove some days, checked LV and... A-D+ were all negatives again! Ok, i used the same method and reduced some values even more from 1.20 to 2.60, so the difference from stock values achieved already - 8-10% somewhere!! But guess when i recently checked LV again, the negatives airflow ranges were present as the first time. :shock: Now what? Subtract even more?? But it seems enough...

Is it a leak? I checked everything, nothing... My last LV is enclosed. Thank you.


Attachments:
Learning View_SS_A2WC521R_2012-03-12 14 49 06.jpg
Learning View_SS_A2WC521R_2012-03-12 14 49 06.jpg [ 73.25 KiB | Viewed 527 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:54 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 2273
Have you checked for a vacuum leak? That might explain the negative "A" values.
If that's not it, I have no idea, sorry.

_________________
2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, LC, FFS, OMG
Please don't send me tuning questions via PM - use the forums instead. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:43 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:43 pm
Posts: 16
NSFW.. As far as I know, my ADM 04/05 Liberty GT has dual O2 sensors. It's a 2.0L twinscroll 5EAT similar to the JDM spec. We run 98RON down here too.

Just an fyi. :)

_________________
05 ADM Liberty GT 2.0L Twinscroll 5sp Auto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:58 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:27 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australian STi & FozXT owner
Base Ignition timing has a major influence in the A and B range. Too much timing and you end up with blue values, not enough and you get red values.

You want to find ignition timing values that give a stable smooth idle and give optimal LV values as well BUT also give a smooth constant g/sec of airflow

_________________
Amateurs built the Ark, Professionals built Titanic
White S206 - PBMS Rollcage, HKS DP, Ti catback
Blue SH9 XT - E85 32bit Multimode Test Vehicle(IAM = 2.000)
Black N14 SSS Pulsar(with a 3.5L V6 Altima swap) getting an EZ30R ECU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:51 pm
Posts: 9
Good information here. I'm currently tuning my vehicle and I'm new to this. I've done a ton of reading and maybe I'm not understanding this. This issue has me perplexed. I adjusted some cells in the idle range and got the immediate trims to stabilize rather tightly. I reset with those values and started the car up. After the reset, corrections were well into the + range, but within a few minutes, those corrections stabilized back down. However, in the meantime, the learned values had steadily crept up and maxed out. After idling for 10+ minutes of reasonable corrections, the learned value didn't drop back down at all. This just seems to be an issue at idle. However, I don't have enough driving logged to determine if this is just isolated to the idle ranges. Should the learned values drop back down in that time range or is there something else I need to be aware of. Injectors are DW1100cc sidefeeds and intake is an AEM CAI.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: How To: Use Learning View to verify closed-loop MAF scal
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:07 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:51 pm
Posts: 9
I never figured out what the problem was, so I basically started from my previous stage 2 tune, made a few changes in unaffected areas to account for dditional parts since, and I'm building it from there. I've got my learning view under control now as that map had maf and injector scaling and I haven't changed those since.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subsilver by phpBBservice.nl