|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
|
It is currently Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:55 pm
|
| Author |
Message |
|
williaty
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:36 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:28 pm Posts: 214
|
|
Here I came in to ask about a new release of LV to support the recently added NAs and already found an answer. If it's just a matter of grunt work to covert the RR-format ECU defs to something LV can parse, I'd be happy to do the work for you and then let you check it if it'll get the update out faster without taking up your time.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
merchgod
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:15 am |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:38 pm Posts: 4224
|
williaty wrote: Here I came in to ask about a new release of LV to support the recently added NAs and already found an answer. If it's just a matter of grunt work to covert the RR-format ECU defs to something LV can parse, I'd be happy to do the work for you and then let you check it if it'll get the update out faster without taking up your time. No, that part is all automated so it is no time at all. I'm going to work on support for the OP 2.0 cable for the next release which will take some time.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:07 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
|
Sorry for my noob question, but when should I connect Lerning View? At the ignition ON, at the engine idling, at high speeds? When?
Or is it doesn't matter?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
scoobytune
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:12 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:33 am Posts: 25
|
Aex1 wrote: Sorry for my noob question, but when should I connect Lerning View? At the ignition ON, at the engine idling, at high speeds? When?
Or is it doesn't matter? Ignition ON or when the engine is running.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:07 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:59 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
|
Any opinions about my ECU, please? The car is OBXT 2005.
Really, I don't like all those minuses. This is a tuned map, made especially for my mods:
SPT CBE SPT Intake Catted Downpipe Catless Uppipe
The ECU reset was made 200 miles ago.
| Attachments: |

My Leaning view.jpg [ 190.21 KB | Viewed 141 times ]
|
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mickeyd2005
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:37 pm |
|
 |
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:32 am Posts: 1778
|
|
What do you mean that this is a tuned map? Did the tuner adjust for the SPT intake? If they did, they did a poor job.
I would get rid of the SPT intake. The stock intake is superior. If you really want a short ram intake, I would get a K&N intake or a Cobb intake. However, the K&N provides more headroom if you go to a larger turbo.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:56 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
mickeyd2005 wrote: What do you mean that this is a tuned map? Did the tuner adjust for the SPT intake? If they did, they did a poor job.
I would get rid of the SPT intake. The stock intake is superior. If you really want a short ram intake, I would get a K&N intake or a Cobb intake. However, the K&N provides more headroom if you go to a larger turbo. Hi, mickeyd2005! You are everywhere  . I wouldn't say whose map is this (PDX or TA), but why are saying this is a poor job? Explain, please. Well, I almost ready to change the SPT intake for the stock one, but first I want to receive more proofs for this step. Meanwhile, the car runs great with this map. Maybe, I don't have the possibility to compare...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mickeyd2005
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 2:29 pm |
|
 |
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:32 am Posts: 1778
|
|
AFR learning D is -6.9% which is outside my range of comfort for a "tuned" intake.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:10 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
mickeyd2005 wrote: AFR learning D is -6.9% which is outside my range of comfort for a "tuned" intake. Ok, thank you, mickeyd.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dmp
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:33 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:10 pm Posts: 2
|
|
Great resource - looking forward to the 2.0 compatability.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
benw
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:58 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:16 am Posts: 274 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Aex1 wrote: Any opinions about my ECU, please? The car is OBXT 2005.
Really, I don't like all those minuses. This is a tuned map, made especially for my mods:
SPT CBE SPT Intake Catted Downpipe Catless Uppipe
The ECU reset was made 200 miles ago. welcome to the world of the SPT intake. It leans out fuel trims severely. This works "okay" when combined with a super-rich stock ECU map, but not on a well-tuned one. I have seen several 2007 STIs with low compression thanks to this intake. Each owner thought it would be a good idea to leave the car stock and only add Subaru-approved mods, knowing the delicate nature of the powerplant and poor ECU tuning, in order to retain factory warranty. This effectively blew up in their faces and they are now replacing the engine anyways. Sorry for the long winded response. Put the kit up on eBay and buy a stock intake. Car will run better, too.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Aex1
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:55 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:30 pm Posts: 6
|
benw wrote: welcome to the world of the SPT intake. It leans out fuel trims severely. This works "okay" when combined with a super-rich stock ECU map, but not on a well-tuned one. I have seen several 2007 STIs with low compression thanks to this intake. Each owner thought it would be a good idea to leave the car stock and only add Subaru-approved mods, knowing the delicate nature of the powerplant and poor ECU tuning, in order to retain factory warranty. This effectively blew up in their faces and they are now replacing the engine anyways.
Sorry for the long winded response. Put the kit up on eBay and buy a stock intake. Car will run better, too. Ok, ok, I'm already convinced to change that thing for a stock one. Thank you for the explanation.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mickeyd2005
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:27 pm |
|
 |
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:32 am Posts: 1778
|
Aex1 wrote: benw wrote: welcome to the world of the SPT intake. It leans out fuel trims severely. This works "okay" when combined with a super-rich stock ECU map, but not on a well-tuned one. I have seen several 2007 STIs with low compression thanks to this intake. Each owner thought it would be a good idea to leave the car stock and only add Subaru-approved mods, knowing the delicate nature of the powerplant and poor ECU tuning, in order to retain factory warranty. This effectively blew up in their faces and they are now replacing the engine anyways.
Sorry for the long winded response. Put the kit up on eBay and buy a stock intake. Car will run better, too. Ok, ok, I'm already convinced to change that thing for a stock one. Thank you for the explanation. If you swap back your stock intake back in, make sure to tell your tuner or to go to compatible OTS tune. I don't know if your tuner adjusted the WOT portion of the maf scale.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Guy on the corner
|
Post subject: Re: Learning View tool Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:25 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:40 am Posts: 169 Location: Colorado
|
Aex1 wrote: benw wrote: Ok, ok, I'm already convinced to change that thing for a stock one. Thank you for the explanation. I've been down this road too and held onto that damn SPT intake longer than I should have. Mickey worked with me also as we tried to tune the SPT but it isn't fully tunable and it offers no advantage over the stock intake anyways... at least at less than 300whp. I found a stock intake locally and put it on and run a paper OEM filter. I run quicker quarters than all the other stage 2 LGT's (running aftermarket intakes) in town. There are plenty of things worth changing but the intake is NOT one of them. Negative LTFT's like yours have you likely running very lean. Looks dangerous! 6-7% less enrichment than your map calls for.. ouch.
_________________ '05 LGT, 13.5 @ 102mph 5800' elevation, E85, stock turbo
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|